Greenwashing and Sustainable Finance: A Key Challenge for Crowdfunding

Greenwashing and Sustainable Finance: A Key Challenge for Crowdfunding

Sustainable finance has become a major driver of the ecological transition, reaching €337 billion in 2023—four times more than in 2020 (FBF, 2023). Impact funds, “green” investments, climate projects: opportunities are multiplying, especially through crowdfunding.  

But this growth comes with a risk now recognized by European regulators: greenwashing. In crowdfunding, where retail investors rely heavily on platform-provided information, the line between real impact and marketing claims can blur. The role of ECSP (European Crowdfunding Service Providers) is therefore central to the credibility of sustainable finance.

Greenwashing: A Risk Recognized by Regulators

European authorities, including ESMA and AMF, define greenwashing as “any communication that may give a misleading, exaggerated, or unverifiable image of the sustainable or impact nature of a financial product.”  

Greenwashing is not limited to false claims. It can also result from imprecise impact indicators, objectives presented as outcomes, or a lack of clear methodology. Regulators emphasize that, even in crowdfunding, intent is not enough: only data and transparency matter.

Why Crowdfunding Is Particularly Exposed

Crowdfunding plays a growing role in financing climate, energy, and clean technology projects. Certain factors make it vulnerable:

  • Retail investors have fewer analytical tools than professionals.

  • They rely heavily on project sheets and platform messaging.

  • The appeal of “green” projects can lead some promoters to overstate environmental benefits, sometimes without methodological basis.

Some platforms adopt a rigorous approach, selecting projects with real, documented impact aligned with the business model.

The Key Role of ECSP in Preventing Greenwashing


The ECSP regulation assigns ECSPs a clear responsibility: provide balanced, clear, and non-misleading information. In practice, this involves:

  • Rigorous project selection

  • Critical analysis of environmental claims

  • Clear distinction between future goals and measured outcomes

  • Transparent communication of limitations, risks, and uncertainties

These practices help avoid confusion between climate ambition and real impact.

How to Spot Greenwashing in a Project?

Before investing in a project labeled “sustainable” or “impact-driven,” watch for warning signs:

  • Vague, unsourced, or unquantified environmental indicators

  • Ambitious promises without methodology or timeline

  • Confusion between future goals and current results

  • Exclusively positive messaging without mention of limitations or risks

  • No clear link between the business model and claimed impact

Rigorous platforms prioritize transparency, data verification, and balanced information.

The We Take Part approach

We Take Part exemplifies a “proof-driven” approach:

  • Projects are selected for real, documented impact aligned with economic activity.

  • Impact indicators are analyzed and contextualized, not taken at face value.

  • Key information is provided to investors for full understanding of the product.

  • Communication includes limitations, risks, and uncertainties for each project.

This approach ensures credible sustainable finance, based on evidence rather than slogans.

Sustainable Finance: Less Promises, More Proof

Recent regulatory work, such as the anti-greenwashing report published in 2024 by European Supervisory Authorities, sends a clear message: sustainable finance must be evidence-based.

In crowdfunding, this requires:

  • Explicit impact methodologies

  • Verifiable data

  • Traceable environmental information

  • Clear distinction between measured results and projections

Essential for Investor Trust

The credibility of sustainable finance relies on trust. In crowdfunding, this trust is built through:

  • ECSP rigor

  • Quality of analysis

  • Honesty in communication

By adopting a strict project selection approach, We Take Part enables funding of the ecological transition while avoiding greenwashing risks.

Sources: FBF (2023), ESMA, AMF, European Supervisory Authorities

Risk Warning: Investing in startups carries the risk of total or partial loss of capital and illiquidity. Only invest what you are prepared to lose.

We Take Part is an EU-authorized Crowdfunding Service Provider (CSP), regulated by the French Financial Markets Authority (AMF) under registration number FP-2024-11, effective as of 10.06.2024. The company is covered by Professional Civil Liability Insurance under AIG. WE TAKE PART SAS, 13T-15 Rue Auguste Gervais, 92130 Issy-les-Moulineaux, France. Registered with the RCS Nanterre under number 912 891 868.

We Take Part is a member of France Fintech National Crowdfunding college

Secure payments via MIPISE Payment Services.

Investing in startups involves a risk of total or partial loss of the invested capital and a risk of illiquidity. Only invest what you are willing to lose.

Useful Information

Legal Information

Newsletter

Our social networks

Receive our monthly newsletter with insights on the Cleantech sectors, the latest funding campaigns, and our news.

->Read our latest newsletter

© We Take Part 2026